Celebrate Nonfiction

Exploring the Joy of Nonfiction Reading and Writing

Classifying Nonfiction: The Continuum Approach

Update June 24, 2024: My thinking about nonfiction classification has evolved since I wrote this post, but I’ve decided not to delete it because there’s value in looking back at my past ideas. For my current thinking, please see the book 5 Kinds of Nonfiction as well as information on my website.



Back in December, I introduced and described what I call
The Nonfiction Family Tree.

I received such a great
response that I discussed it again (and provided a list of sample books) in early January. Then I suggested an activity for introducing it to students
later in the month. Since then, many educators have tried the activity with
students and provided me with feedback. Thank you! And SLJ published this article, which brought together all my thinking on this topic. I love the groovy graphic Mark Tuchman created!

In biology, classification
helps us (1) make sense of the diversity of life and (2) understand how living
things are related to one another. Classifying nonfiction has similar benefits.
It helps readers understand the kind of information they’re likely to find in a
particular book, how that information will be presented, and how they can
access it. It can also help a reader identify the kind(s) of nonfiction he/she
enjoys reading the most.

While most children’s
nonfiction books fit snugly in one of the five categories, some are blended
titles that have characteristics of two adjacent categories.

For example, as I discussed here, many books (even fiction books)
include a combination of expository and narrative text. While one writing style
usually dominates, there are some books that contain roughly equal amounts of
each.

 

Similarly, the line between
expository literature and traditional nonfiction can sometimes be blurry. There
are also books that have some browse-able traits and some traditional traits.

So while each of the five
categories has a distinct origin story,
which may be interesting to those of us who have watched the growth and evolution
of nonfiction over the last couple of decades, in practice, it may be more
useful to think of them as points on a continuum, with each category gradually blending
into the next like the colors in a rainbow.

It seems to me that this
sort of visual model more accurately represents the diversity of nonfiction
available today and how the various types are related to one another. What do
you think?

5 Responses

  1. The visual model is perfect and so useful for the classroom. Just yesterday, my Kindergarten class was sorting through our frog books before beginning a small research project related to our vernal pool study. There were several books which straddled genres in their minds, and I look forward to sharing this graphic with them. We can use it as our model.

top 25 nonfiction blog award

Most Popular Posts

top 25 nonfiction blog award

Most Popular Posts

© 2001–[current-year] Melissa Stewart. All rights reserved. All materials on this site may be copied for classroom or library use but may not be reprinted or resold for commercial purposes. This website is COPPA compliant. If you are a child under age 13 and wish to contact Melissa Stewart, please use the email address of a teacher, librarian, or parent with that adult’s permission. Webhost Privacy Policy.