Celebrate Nonfiction

Exploring the Joy of Nonfiction Reading and Writing

Behind the Books: What an Informational Book ISN’T

In
last week’s post, I outlined the origin and meanings of the three contradictory
definitions for “informational book” that are currently is use. There is also
a fourth use floating around out there, but it is without foundation.

Let’s
face it. Writing engaging nonfiction isn’t easy. Because you can’t make
anything up, you have to rely on the information that’s available, and
sometimes the information a writer would like to include simply doesn’t exist.

It
can be tempting to invent dialog or rearrange chronology a bit to improve a
story arc. So tempting that some writers would love a term that justifies doing
so. That’s why it’s no surprise that some people misuse the term “informational
book,” thinking it is a kind of nonfiction that is based on true information
but takes occasional liberties with the verifiable facts.

But
this is NOT a legitimate use of the term “informational book”. NONE of the
three accepted definitions make room for made-up material with the goal of
strengthening a story. NONE.

If
you make up anything, anything at all, you are writing fiction. Period.

So
why does this mis-definition persist? There are a couple of reasons. I’ll discuss
the first of them next week.

top 25 nonfiction blog award

Most Popular Posts

top 25 nonfiction blog award

Most Popular Posts

© 2001–[current-year] Melissa Stewart. All rights reserved. All materials on this site may be copied for classroom or library use but may not be reprinted or resold for commercial purposes. This website is COPPA compliant. If you are a child under age 13 and wish to contact Melissa Stewart, please use the email address of a teacher, librarian, or parent with that adult’s permission. Webhost Privacy Policy.